<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Generating Namespaces and schemas for your Seam components</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2008/01/08/generating-namespaces-and-schemas-for-your-seam-components/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2008/01/08/generating-namespaces-and-schemas-for-your-seam-components/</link>
	<description>Blog by a developer for a developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:52:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pomeroy</title>
		<link>http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2008/01/08/generating-namespaces-and-schemas-for-your-seam-components/comment-page-1/#comment-13989</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pomeroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2008/01/08/generating-namespaces-and-schemas-for-your-seam-components/#comment-13989</guid>
		<description>This example really &quot;saved my bacon&quot;.  I&#039;m not 100% sure I know the correct way to model (in schema) components that have collection/array fields. 

Can you extend your template above to show how to model the following:

&lt;code&gt;
class Custom {
  String[] ids;
  AnotherClass[] entries;
}
&lt;/code&gt;

I&#039;m reasonably schema savvy but complex content models combined with various model groups and all the possible variations in between really gets hairy for me.

Thanks,

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This example really &#8220;saved my bacon&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not 100% sure I know the correct way to model (in schema) components that have collection/array fields. </p>
<p>Can you extend your template above to show how to model the following:</p>
<p><code><br />
class Custom {<br />
  String[] ids;<br />
  AnotherClass[] entries;<br />
}<br />
</code></p>
<p>I&#8217;m reasonably schema savvy but complex content models combined with various model groups and all the possible variations in between really gets hairy for me.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Saurugger</title>
		<link>http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2008/01/08/generating-namespaces-and-schemas-for-your-seam-components/comment-page-1/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Saurugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2008/01/08/generating-namespaces-and-schemas-for-your-seam-components/#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>Jacob, yes auto-generation in seam-gen and an option for an existing entity in jboss developer studio would be very helpfull.

How about de-serializing instance documents outside of components.xml - is this part of the public API? And of course serializing them into instance docs based on these schemas? Maybe it is already all there before my eyes but I have not seen it yet ...

This would allow Seam to bridge not only the db - java object layers, but also the xml representation that is necessary in most real world environments. Yes, I dont want to have to mess with another framework jaxb/xmlbeans/castor/... unless absolutely necessary ... Seam would be the &quot;Rosetta Stone&quot; of software development</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob, yes auto-generation in seam-gen and an option for an existing entity in jboss developer studio would be very helpfull.</p>
<p>How about de-serializing instance documents outside of components.xml &#8211; is this part of the public API? And of course serializing them into instance docs based on these schemas? Maybe it is already all there before my eyes but I have not seen it yet &#8230;</p>
<p>This would allow Seam to bridge not only the db &#8211; java object layers, but also the xml representation that is necessary in most real world environments. Yes, I dont want to have to mess with another framework jaxb/xmlbeans/castor/&#8230; unless absolutely necessary &#8230; Seam would be the &#8220;Rosetta Stone&#8221; of software development</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
