Comments on: Solution using Seam to pagination issue with JSF on DataModel updates http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/ Blog by a developer for a developer Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:52:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: jacob.orshalick http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-296 jacob.orshalick Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:18:24 +0000 http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/#comment-296 Thanks for the comment Andy! Yes, this is certainly another option, but I thought it was a nice example (outside of the usual auditing, logging, security, etc) to demonstrate using stereotypes and get others thinking. As you mention, you could always abstract the repeated JSF invocation out to some helper method and invoke it in a refresh(), but that's just not quite as exciting ;) Thanks for the comment Andy!

Yes, this is certainly another option, but I thought it was a nice example (outside of the usual auditing, logging, security, etc) to demonstrate using stereotypes and get others thinking. As you mention, you could always abstract the repeated JSF invocation out to some helper method and invoke it in a refresh(), but that’s just not quite as exciting ;)

]]> By: Andy Gibson http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-293 Andy Gibson Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:42:15 +0000 http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/#comment-293 Why not just have a refresh() method that resets the results and the position. Since you are re-performing the search why not make the index reset a part of the research? However, it is a great example on the power of creating your own stereotypes and using annotations/interceptors to neatly solve problems. Why not just have a refresh() method that resets the results and the position. Since you are re-performing the search why not make the index reset a part of the research?

However, it is a great example on the power of creating your own stereotypes and using annotations/interceptors to neatly solve problems.

]]> By: jacob.orshalick http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-105 jacob.orshalick Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:51:01 +0000 http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/#comment-105 No, it is simply required that the <code>@DataModel</code> be available from the context (i.e. PAGE or CONVERSATION). So if you wanted to make <code>myAction @Stateless</code>, just make sure you outject to the appropriate context and you will be all set. No, it is simply required that the @DataModel be available from the context (i.e. PAGE or CONVERSATION). So if you wanted to make myAction @Stateless, just make sure you outject to the appropriate context and you will be all set.

]]> By: lsabin http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-104 lsabin Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:52:12 +0000 http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/#comment-104 Wonderful idea. Just a question: is it needed that the component 'myAction' be @Stateful? Wonderful idea.
Just a question: is it needed that the component ‘myAction’ be @Stateful?

]]> By: koenhandekyn http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-45 koenhandekyn Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:50:57 +0000 http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2007/11/13/solution-using-seam-to-pagination-issue-with-jsf-on-datamodel-updates/#comment-45 great article !! it solved the problem in a breeze !!!! great article !! it solved the problem in a breeze !!!!

]]>